| | Comments (2)


I have refrained from blogging for a while for a couple of reasons. One, to coin a Yogi Berraism, I haven't had much to say and didn't know how to say it. Actually, a post Eric Johnson did a day or so ago reminded me why I hadn't been posting and, at the same time got me in the mood to start again.

Eric commented that he was ceasing regular visits to Mark Shea's blog because of Mark's testiness with those who disagree with him on Iraq. I haven't visited Mark's blog in a while and don't know if the charges are true or not. But the reason I left off blogging for a while was that I felt I was becoming less than charitable and that it would be better to let the mood pass than keep on posting in an uncharitable manner. This is a difficult thing to do since, being so right about so many things it's hard to see how anyone could possible disagree with anything I said or wrote. In any case, I needed to get a grip.

As it happens, I am one of the one's who would likely arouse Mark's ire, I firmly believe that the invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do. I believe this is so because Iraq under Saddam was actively aiding Taliban and numerous assorted other terrorists, avowed enemies of the United States who are determined to bring America down. I think we have a right and a duty, in a time of war, to attack our enemies and I believe that arguments about weapons of mass destruction, etc are irrelevant. I think this is a valid position under the so-called "just war" theory and is, I think, the gist of Eric’s position.

On another note, there was a (nearly illiterate) comment posted over at Two Sleepy Mommies by Susie Q. that was quite interesting. I found it interesting in that it shows what has happened today in terms of Scriptural literacy, in fact, literacy in general. The comment by Susie Q makes some rather far out statements about Christianity that betray no hint of real thought, much less a concern for facts. Rather, this post is an example of the typical attitude promoted about religious faith that is abroad in our society. I guess I am more concerned about this because none of the comments in response offer real answers to Susie Q's protests about religious faith. So, without further ado . . .

The first thing SQ seems to be saying that Jesus was a 1st century con artist and that he duped people. She says "back then anyone could have come to town and said 'I am the son of god (sic)' and people would have believed him." The fact is, the Gospels are quite clear that "people", even, perhaps especially, those closest to him, the disciples, hardly understood what he was teaching, did not blindly accept what he was claiming to be, and protested His plans when He revealed them. When Jesus taught that, in order to have life people would have to "eat my flesh and drink my blood", not only did people not blindly accept it, many quit following him. After his crucifixion, his disciples thought that the work He had started was finished, they had no expectation of His Resurrection occurring, and were deeply discouraged, and afraid of being arrested themselves. The picture we have in the Bible is not of a people swept away by a con; rather it is one of a failure of Jesus life and ministry, ended by the death given a common criminal, only the fact of the Resurrection made a difference. Hardly the picture a group of people working a con would want published abroad.

SQ also goes on to say, basically, that whatever is true for you is true. "Nobody's right, noone (sic) is wrong." I might ask: if I choose to adopt a religion, have a "sudden enlightenment", that I can attain complete spiritual maturity and a full and rich life experience by jumping off the Empire State Building, and that no harm can possibly come to me as a result, is that true? What if I decide 2 + 2 = 6? Is that true? And what happens to me if I choose to live my life in this way? Perhaps no harm will be done, as long as I choose to do nothing but be a blogger for the rest of my life. But what if I choose to be an aeronautical engineer? Would you like to fly on a plane I designed? This idea that whatever is true for you may not be true for me is one of the most pernicious, empty headed, "tolerant" ideas that our society has come up with. Its nonsense and no one who stops to think about it for even a minute could possibly believe they actually live this way.

SQ finally states "there is solid proof that moses (sic) used magic to spread the waters of the great sea (sic) to free the slaves?" Was "moses" present at Lincoln's side when he signed the Emancipation Proclamation? Or did he spread the waters with margarine? In any case, is this "solid proof" offered by someone who was there? Or did they test the waters of the "great sea" to determine that on such and such a date they had been magically "spread"? For that matter, which waters did they test?

Many folks today think they can make any statement they want, so long as it makes them feel good. There is no concern for truth, nor even any acceptance of the reality of truth. The problem is this leads to a life that is much less than the one God intended each one of us to live. It reduces us to the level of idiots and makes us subject to any con game that comes along, as amply demonstrated by Susie Q. But religion is not just some “feel good” new age experience. It has little to do with feelings and much to do with choice. In order to make good choices for our lives, we need to make those choices in accordance with reality. In order to do that, we must have some understanding of what the reality of our world really is, we must know the Truth.


i was hoping you would tell us why you haven't been writing, i didn't give up on you...prayers...


Thanks, I always appreciate your encourgagement.

Paz y bien

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ron Moffat published on December 10, 2003 8:22 PM.

Current Reading was the previous entry in this blog.

Through a Glass, Darkly is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.